|
GRADING & REFERENCES.
It is our
policy to grade every numismatic item we offer for sale. In so doing we
use the principles published in the section “A guide to grading coins”
in COLLECTING AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH COINS presented by Australasian
Numismatic Dealers Association (ANDA).
 |
The ANDA guide
provides an excellent summary as to the matters involved in this
aspect of your collecting and for the convenience of those who
do not have the document the content of the section dealing with
coin grading is substantially reproduced herein.
“Next to
being authentic, correct grading is a fundamentally important
aspect when purchasing a coin. This fact applies particularly so
with coins of a high state of preservation. If scarcity is an
additional factor, then the difference in value between one
grade and another could mean many thousands of dollars. |
In
Australia most coins are graded by the adjectival standard. Basic
definitions for terms used are found in both our major Numismatic
Guides, the McDonald and Renniks publications.
New collectors
(and occasionally even some fairly advanced hobbyist might not easily
come to terms with what is meant by Fine, VF, EF etc. Surprisingly the
grade UNC (Uncirculated) can be the challenging to understand.
Adjectival grading
favours descriptive terminology, which can be used in a condensed form.
The term Very Fine is therefore abbreviated to VF, Uncirculated becomes
UNC etc. Generally speaking, information available to collectors in
regards to the definition of individual grades is somewhat scant, even
contradictory. Such lack of knowledge can be particularly costly when
acquiring UNCIRCULATED coins, which by themselves have more than one
grade.
Novice collectors
may question why there are different grades of Uncirculated. Surely a
coin is either UNC or it is not. Unfortunately it is not as easy as
that.
In the strictest
sense of the word all coins may be regarded as UNC until the Reserve
Bank issues them for circulation. Some coins will obviously be ‘luckier’
than others during the minting and pre-issue processes, where they may
be subject to worn dies, resulting in a weak or poorly defined strike,
or contact with each other inviting nicks or scratches (Contact or
Bagmarks). It follows then that the production process itself will
create characteristics, which may be at odds with each other when
grading a coin. As in a Weak Strike without Bagmarks (Contact or
Detracting Marks), against a perfect strike with a number of these.
Throw in a course finish plus a few die cracks from a well-used die, and
an (strictly speaking) Uncirculated coin may not exactly what you had in
mind for your collection.
Consequently, it
is obvious that uncirculated coins will have varying degrees of appeal
and therefore value to collectors. For that reason a hierarchy of
definitive terms such as
FDC
Fluer de Coin (French for Flower of the Die)
GEM Gem-Uncirculated
CHU
Choice Uncirculated
UNC
Uncirculated-typical
are justified and
may be used by dealers and collectors to allow for different grades of
uncirculated coins.
Collectors will
notice that the grade FDC or a definition for it is not always listed in
the pricing sections of general catalogues. FDC refers to perfection,
and it is rare to encounter a circulation type coin that is deserving of
this term. Collectors can expect to pay a premium for a perfect coin, if
they are ever lucky enough to be offered on.
For coins that
show wear to a lesser or greater extent, the Hierarchy of Terms
continues as flows.
aUNC
almost Uncirculated
EF
Extra Tine
VF
Very Fine
F
Fine
VG
Very Good
G
Good.
The Basic Story
Grading, by its
very nature, will always embody a degree of subjectivity. The key to
limit subjectiveness is a definition, as accurately as possible, of the
terms used to grade a coin. Price then depends on the perceived current
market values, which may well be a negotiating point between the buyer
and the seller.”
In further
elaboration ANDA details supplementary information relevant to the
subject.
“Intermediate
terms: The terms listed earlier are referred to as Major Grades.
However, in many instances the condition of a coin may be a little
better or not quite up to, the definition given for the Main Grade.
Thus, for coins up to the condition UNC, intermediate grades are used to
grade a coin that may be just a little better than the Main Grade, or
not quite up to the given definition. Therefore the grade of a slightly
better than VF coin may be expressed as gVF = good VF. A coin not quite
as good as the Main Grade may be offered as aEF = almost EF or nEF =
near EF or simply “about EF”. The variations of individual adjectives
are personal preference a seller may have, they do have the same
meaning.
Split Grades
are sometimes used to indicate that a coin is of different quality on
one side when compared with the other. Thus CHU/Unc will indicate that
the Obverse of a coin is in Choice Uncirculated condition while the
Reverse grades UNC. The value of a split grade coin is usually somewhat
closer to the lower grade rather than the higher. (Please note that the
Obverse or Portrait Side of a coin is graded first).
Strike
refers to the quality of the detail visible on a freshly struck coin. As
the die nears the end of its working life and wears out, detail may be
missing on the highest points of the design. Occasionally a die would
crack before being retired. Hence die cracks may result on the finished
product.
Contact Marks
are sometimes referred to as Detracting marks. These include Bag Marks
and Edge Nicks. Scratches, hairlines and general surface marks are
closely related. In FDC and UNC range of grades these must be of a
virtually non-existent to relatively insignificant nature and in keeping
with the definition for the given grade. If a coin would grade CHU or
better when considering other aspects, but Detracting Marks are more
than would be allowable for such a high grade then the coin should only
be graded as UNC. Serious Detracting Marks must always be mentioned
separately.
Mint Bloom or
Mint Lustre results from the radial flow
of metal towards the rim of a coin during the striking process. This
will cause the surface of the freshly minted coin to take on a dazzling
reflective appearance. It can often be seen on toned coins (where it may
be referred to as underlying Lustre) but rarely on coins that are worn.
A most desirable aspect of a coin with original Mint Lustre is the so
called Cartwheel Effect. Tilting a coin in a circular motion around its
centre will show a strongly reflective line “cart wheeling” around the
face of the coin.
Mint Lustre is
negatively affected by cleaning and cannot be reproduced on an
un-professionally cleaned coin. Not to be confused with Brilliance,
which is a term more suitable for original colour remaining on Bronze
coins.
Eye Appeal
is a combination of all the previously mentioned aspects. It is the most
subjective feature of the art of grading. In a general sense, when
overall Eye Appeal is present, it may influence the grade in a slightly
positive manner. An experienced grader will consider Eye Appeal before
assigning a final grade. However (and particularly so in the grades FDC
and GEM) one or two superior characteristics cannot result in FDC or GEM
if another major aspect is not in keeping with the overall definition
for these higher grades.”
PICTURES.
We include a
picture of the items we list for sale. It should be born in mind that these
supplement and support our quality statement made in the terms of the
ANDA Guide.
We do not ask you to determine a coin grade with advice along the lines
of “there is a picture - you grade the item for yourself”. No matter the
extent of your experience this is often quite impracticable and for
those with little experience it is impossible.
The basic reason
for this is that not only is it often impossible to show detractions
such as Hairlines or fine detail. Correct colour reproduction can be
enhanced or tarted up with picture software. In the end a picture is
destined to be viewed by you via the computer monitor which is only
capable of displaying a low resolution two dimension image.
The fine details
in the highest grade coins restrict the worth of a picture. Never the
less they do prove an asset in providing supplementary reassuring
information. For example there are no problems in determining the
overall degree of wear on the portrait, even down to making an adequate
assessment of the state of the crown band or ADVANCE AUSTRALIA. You will
not however be able to determine the exact state of pearls unless
supplementary pictures of the fine detail are available. They can also
be useful in prompting a question. So please use them as a guide to our
descriptive advice and where you feel you need further information
please contact us.
REFERENCE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Our
item listing descriptions have a short prefix referencing the catalogue
number publication. The sources we use include;
|
B |
Burzinski, Lester M. Communion Tokens of the World. |
|
BHM |
Brown L. British Historical Medals 1760 – 1960, (3 volumes). |
|
C |
Carlisle L.J. Australian Commemorative Medals and Medalets from
1788. |
|
Ch |
Cross, W.K. The Charlton Standard Catalogue of Canadian Colonial
Tokens 3rd Edition. |
|
D |
Davenport, J.S. German and European Thalers etc. Various
volumes. |
|
D
& H |
Dalton R & Hammer S & H. The Token Provincial Token of the 18th
Century. Reprint |
|
E |
Eimer C. British Commemorative Medals and their Values |
|
ESC |
Raynor, P. Alan. The English Silver Coinage from 1649. |
|
F |
Freeman Michael J. The Bronze Coinage of Great Britain. |
|
KM |
Krause, C & Mischler, C. Standard Catalog of World Coins.
Various volumes/editions. |
|
Mc D |
McDonald G. The Pocketbook Guide to Australian Coins and
Banknotes. Various editions |
|
P |
Peck, C.W. English Copper, Tin & Bronze Coins in the British
Museum, 1558 – 1958. Reprint. |
|
R |
Skinner D. Renniks Coin and Banknote Guide 15th
Edition. Adelaide 1989.
Pitt I. Renniks Australian Coin and Banknote Values. Various
editions.
McConnelly, I. Australian Pre-Decimal Coin Varieties. |
|
S |
Spink. Standard Catalogue of British Coins - Coins of England
and the United Kingdom. |
|
Sch |
Schwer, Siegfried E. Price Guide to Unofficial Farthings.
Contains reprint of Unofficial Farthings 1820 – 1870 by R.C.Bell
1975. |
|
W |
Williamson, George C. Trade Tokens issued in the 17th
Century. Reprint 3 volumes. |
|